Apartment Parking - Bird Issue

Residents had to come down to the parking area and clean the bird poo off their vehicles before they can leave the estate. 

Residents have a reasonable expectation that when they purchase their apartments which includes a parking space for their vehicle, that such parking is fit for purpose.

If it's not fit for the purpose, then the Operator should take the necessary steps to remedy the situation. Any remedial work required should be at the Operator's cost.

While the operator has made numerous attempts to stop the birds roosting in the parking areas, none have been succesful and the operator refuses to install a roller door at the entry to the car park, which would prevent the birds from entering the car park area altogether, thus solving the problem. 

The operator refuses to install the roller door at his cost, but is more than happy to install the roller door if the residents pay for it.

Residents should not have to pay additional costs to enhance or improve the parking area, to ensure that it is fit for purpose. Residents simply want to park their vehicles without being subjected to such a health hazard.

Yet another example where the Operator is happy for residents to pay for a suitable roller door to stop the birds entering the apartment car parking areas, which then becomes his asset and he hasn't had to pay a cent for the upgrade.

Camden Grove, a sister village, has a suitable roller door installed, but the Operator refuses to install a similar door to the apartment blocks in this estate.